| |
New MediaDay
Study is Communications Planning Tool
With more and more people
"multimedia tasking," it's essential for marketers and their
agencies to understand each medium's role and how those roles interact
with each other. MRI's MediaDay study, scheduled to launch to the
marketplace in the fourth quarter of 2006, will increase the value of
MRI's product and media consumption information with time-based data. It
will tell marketers when consumers use media in a 24 hour day, where
they are when using that media, what else they are doing at that time
and how focused they are on a particular medium.
The MediaDay study is being conducted via a telephone recontact
of respondents to MRI's Survey of the American Consumer. It will
launch with a sample of 8,000 and will survey 5,000 consumers each year
after that.
|
Sample MediaDay
Information
|
| What
media did consumers use in the last 24 hours? |
-
Television
-
Radio
-
Internet
-
Magazines
-
Newspapers
-
Outdoor
(Exposure)
|
| When
did they use it? |
-
Start/stop
times asked for TV, Radio, Internet, Magazines and Newspapers.
Dayparts asked for Outdoor
|
| Where
were they when they consumed a specific medium? |
|
| What
were they doing while consuming a specific medium? |
|
How
focused were they when consuming a specific medium?
|
-
Very
focused
-
Somewhat
focused
-
Not
very focused
-
Not
at all focused
|
| Note:
MediaDay information will be married to respondents'
product/attitudinal data from MRI's Survey of the American
Consumer |
Several "bonus" new-media
questions will also be included, such as how commercials are treated on
DVRs, instant messenger usage, consumption and creation of blogs and use
of the Internet to download music, movies and TV programs.
MediaDay
Helps Marketers Deliver the Right Messages to the Right Prospect at the
Right Time & Place
| |
"MRI's MediaDay
study will allow subscribers to more effectively plan
communication strategies against consumer targets. Many of MRI's
Media Agency clients have developed their own tools, using MRI
data, or proprietary data, to construct their version of a target
consumer's daily media behavior. MRI, through this pioneering
recontact, is now able to offer the rich behavioral, attitudinal
and product usage data associated with MRI's Survey of the
American Consumer, through the lens of a consumer's media day.
MRI's MediaDay study will also enable our Media Agency
customers to analyze the impact of emerging communication vehicles
such as blogs, instant messaging, and use of DVRs, making these
data even more insightful and impactful."
Scott Turner
MRI SVP, Agency Sales |
|
Armed with MediaDay's rich
time-based data, marketers and agencies can:
-
Target by Availability:
Determine when and where the target is "reachable" by
specific communication channels throughout the course of the day.
-
Target by Behavior: Because MediaDay
information will be married to respondents' product/attitudinal
data, users can target consumers based on behavior and
availability.
-
Target by Attentiveness: Gauge
when the target is most engaged by each of the communication
channels. Engagement can be measured by targets' self-reported
degree of focus and by the derived metric of Sole Medium Usage.
For more information on MRI's MediaDay
study, please contact
us.
back
to top
|
|
| |
Guideposts, Audience Engagement and MRI
Some magazines rely exclusively on the experience, judgment and insight
of their editors to develop articles that will engage readers; others
conduct proprietary research to help set direction. And then there are
publications like Guideposts, that are also creatively mining the
wealth of syndicated research available in MRI's Survey of the
American Consumer to gauge the success of their editorial direction.
Guideposts seeks an efficient approach to stay in touch with
their nearly eight million readers as well as reliable metrics for
measuring engagement and audience affinity with their content.
| |
According to MRI's
Fall 2005, Survey of the American Consumer LifeMatrix data,
Guideposts' readers share the same values that the magazine
purports. When readers were asked to rate the importance of
several statements, the following were ranked as very important:
|
|
|
Statement |
Percent
Guideposts Readers
Very Important |
|
|
Protecting
the family: Having safety for loved ones |
94% |
|
|
Learning:
Continuing to learn throughout my life |
93% |
|
|
Stable
personal relationships: Maintaining a long-term commitment to
friends and loved ones |
93% |
|
|
Faith:
Holding to religious faith and belief |
92% |
|
|
Duty:
Fulfilling obligations to family, community and country |
91% |
|
|
Honesty:
Being sincere, having integrity |
86% |
|
|
Freedom:
Having freedom of action and thought |
85% |
|
|
Respecting
ancestors: Showing respect for those who came before us |
84% |
|
|
Equality:
Desiring equal opportunity for all |
82% |
|
|
Social
responsibility: Working for the welfare of society |
71% |
|
|
Source:
Mediamark Research Inc., Fall 2005 |
|
"Guideposts' strong
connection to our readers' lives and the unique reader-written,
first-person true stories that make up every issue are why our readers
are so highly involved in this magazine," says Edward Grinnan, Guideposts
editor-in-chief. Grinnan says MRI engagement measures help formulate the
overall editorial direction that can inspire high levels of action among
their audience. "I'm very interested each spring and fall in seeing
the MRI reader quality numbers - almost like you'd look at 'customer
satisfaction' scores in any business. As we track our progress, it's
gratifying to see that Guideposts reader engagement levels remain
in the top ranks of all magazines in MRI."
Editors and writers at Guideposts
have known for years that their readers are highly supportive of
initiatives that promote social action, specifically those that prompt
people to participate in programs that have a direct and positive impact
on the lives of others. For example, an article about refugee children
spawned the Guideposts Knit for Kids program, resulting in
readers donating more than 300,000 handmade sweaters to needy children
around the world during the past ten years. Readers also volunteered
with the Red Feather Foundation to build homes on Native American
reservations after the magazine published an article on the program -
further demonstrating how this unusually active audience is influenced
by the magazine's content. MRI's qualitative measures, especially the
engagement metrics, provide proof of Guideposts' audience
involvement.
"Because our rankings consistently lead key categories, MRI's
engagement metrics confirm that Guideposts' content is on track
in terms of appealing to our audience," says Grinnan. "For
example, 80% of our readers rate the magazine as 'one of their
favorites' or as 'very good,' and 71% 'read or looked into three or more
of the past four issues.' Guideposts' readers spend an average of 72
minutes per issue - further demonstrating their strong relationship with
our title."
"MRI's reader involvement numbers are an important part of our
editorial decision-making process and help confirm that we are on the
right track," continues Guideposts' Grinnan. "We are in
a unique position to affect change; knowing that we are selecting
articles that will help inspire our readers and motivate them to take
positive social action."
back
to top
|
|
| |
New Column
Answers Clients' Data Questions
This new column answers data questions
from MRI clients. If you have a question you would like us to answer in
future editions of The Source, please let
us know.
Question:
Why do MRI and Census Data on Pregnancy Differ?
Throughout the years, we have frequently been questioned about MRI's
pregnancy numbers in respect to the Census Bureau's figures. The Census
(as of 2002) reports that there are approximately four million births in
a year. In the Fall 2005 Survey of the American Consumer, MRI
reports approximately two and a half million pregnancies. The numbers
are different because the Census reports total births in a year and MRI
measures pregnancies at a given point in time.
|
Differences in
Measures |
Census
Number of Births Annually
(Actual birth data, not survey data) |
MRI
Number of Pregnancies Within a Nine-Month Period
Respondents are asked during a personal interview if they are
expecting a baby within the next nine months, and if so, in how
many months the baby is expected |
Issues that
Affect the MRI Numbers:
During the first trimester of pregnancy, the MRI numbers are understated
because either the respondent doesn't know of the pregnancy or the
pregnancy may not be reported for personal reasons, such as
superstitions about sharing early on. Since there are 3 million
pregnancies in any given point (see math below), there are about 333,000
pregnancies in a month. If one looks at the MRI pregnancy data arrayed
by when the baby is due (in one month, two months, etc.) one sees that
the appropriate levels are attained in later stages of the pregnancy and
in earlier stages of pregnancy one can see the understating playing out.
For example, in Fall 2005, there are 365,000 pregnancies reported at the
point when the baby is due in one month, while there are only 54,000
pregnancies reported when the baby is due in eight months.
The Math:
- 39/52
.75
(number of gestation weeks/number of weeks in a year)
- .75 (4,000,000)
3
million pregnancies in any given point
- Difference is = number of total births
in a year (CENSUS) versus number of pregnancies within any given
point (MRI).
back
to top
|
|
| |
MRI Launches Hispanic Recontact Study
Mediamark subscribers targeting Hispanic
Americans can expand upon the information provided in the Survey of
the American Consumer by asking proprietary questions in the new 2006
Hispanic Recontact Study. MRI is accepting reservations for this
limited-space study that allows media, advertisers and agencies to
secure a set of proprietary questions administered to Hispanic
respondents from the 2006 Doublebase study. Like MRI's Omnibus
Recontact Study, which has been conducted for four years, this is a
shared survey, costing far less while offering the same benefits of
proprietary research.
"Companies marketing to Hispanic Americans must develop strategies
that address their unique interests and needs, and this study lets
subscribers ask targeted questions of respondents who have already
participated in our survey," says MRI President and CEO Kathi Love.
"This represents another step in MRI's long-term initiative to
capture the media and lifestyle characteristics of the American Hispanic
market."
MRI's Survey of the American Consumer already reports differences
in the purchasing behaviors and psychographic mindsets of the Hispanic
and General Market consumers. The Hispanic Recontact Study
affords opportunities to gather additional information addressing unique
characteristics of Hispanic Americans. Buyers of the Hispanic
Recontact Study will be able to compare their proprietary data to
MRI's Survey of the American Consumer.
|
Selected
Psychographic Questions
% Agree strongly or somewhat
(Index to All Adults) |
Total
U.S. Adults |
Total U.S.
Hispanic
Adults |
| I only buy food
items that are name-brand, not generic brands |
100 |
119 |
| I don't allow junk
food in my home |
100 |
120 |
| I prefer
alternative medicine to traditional medical practices |
100 |
129 |
| In general, newer
drug brands work better than older brands |
100 |
116 |
| I prefer popular
brand-name drugs, even if they cost more |
100 |
120 |
| Source:
Mediamark Research Inc., Fall 2005 |
|
MRI will recontact approximately 5,000
Hispanic respondents for this study; a response rate of 15% to 20% (750
to 1,000 completed interviews) is anticipated. The recontact
questionnaire will be a maximum of eight pages; four pages in English
and four of Spanish translation. Whole pages or a half pages of
questions may be purchased. Clients may develop their own questionnaire
pages; MRI's Research Department is available for consultation.
The price of participation in this study
is $40,000 for a page (approximately 50 lines) of questions; half pages
(25 lines) are available at $25,000. Commitments from subscribers are
due May 1, 2006 and fieldwork begins September 2006, results delivered
in January 2007.
For more information on this study, or to
place your reservation, please contact your MRI representative, or Susan
Nunez.
back
to top
Just
How Popular is Podcasting?
In 2005, "Podcasting" - the verbal
melding of iPod and broadcasting - was dubbed "Word of the
Year" by the editors of the New Oxford American Dictionary.
But exactly who is listening to/viewing these widely distributed digital
files?
Last fall, MRI joined forces with Podtrac to create the first-ever
profile of the podcast audience. Podtrac was founded in 2005 to enable
podcasters - everyone from individuals to The New York Times - to
monetize their audio and video feeds, and to give advertisers a way to
measure, target and buy podcast sponsorships and advertisements.
According to the findings of Podtrac's first online survey of 1,000
respondents, fielded in December 2005, 78% of those who had ever
listened to a podcast were men, reinforcing the early
"maleness" of the Internet itself. However, of those who had
ever listened, 51% of women versus 39% of men had done so in the past
week. This is "reflective of the ever-increasing variety of podcast
content with broadening appeal to both genders," according to
Podtrac CEO and Co-founder Mark McCrery.
Podtrac, with MRI's assistance, also conducted additional research, the Podtrac
Audience Insights survey (22,202
respondents, November through December 2005), and is offering the survey
free to podcasters. Among its findings, this survey reveals that in
terms of hardware, 56% of podcast listeners/viewers received podcasts on
an MP3 player, compared to 41% via computer. Other ways of accessing
podcasts include cell phones, PlayStation and PocketPC.
MRI matched the Podtrac Audience Insights responses to its Survey
of the American Consumer, generating various indices by podcast
genre - for example comedy, entertainment, music and technology.
Demographics for the technology podcast were decidedly male (96%) and
indexed at 361 for household income between $100,000 and $149,199, and
869 for having earned a master's degree. Listeners of the entertainment
podcast indexed at 236 for income exceeding $200,000, and those who had
spent more than $800 online in the past year indexed at 790.
For more information about podcast users, please contact Paul
Gold.
back
to top
|
|